Crack Kills: Trials and Tribulations With the Google DCO (Display Conversion Optimizer)

Once upon a time, I had a number of AdWords contextual network campaigns humming along quite nicely.  Then along came the Google serpent and offered me a bite of the Display Conversion Optimizer.  It did not come with a guarantee of working, but the promise was that many of my competitors in similar verticals had seen large upticks in volume at good CPA’s.  So, I said sure, let’s give it a go.  I think I wish I hadn’t.  The DCO has made a crack addict out of me, and now I can’t quit it.  I hope to God Google never stops supporting the Display Conversion Optimizer, or I will surely be SOL.  The following are my impressions, backed by both my numbers and my gut.

What Is It?

The Google Display Conversion Optimizer (or DCO for short) is a new option for heavy spending advertisers to start new Contextual Network campaigns.  What it does is attempt to automatically find new websites for your placements based off the historical performance of your Display URLs on the Google AdSense network.  Your Google Representative can probably provide you with a worksheet of eligible Display URLs and recommended CPA’s to try out with the DCO.  Thus, if your Display URL structure is weak, you might have a bad time with the DCO.  Note that not any old person can go and set up a DCO campaign in their account; you have to ask your Google Rep to get opted in.  If you do not have a Google Rep, you probably have a bad chance of getting opted in to the DCO.  However, if you have been opted, in, PPC Hero has a good blog post on what to do for DCO Implementation.

Pros of the DCO

  • Gain effective volume from sites you wouldn’t have thought of that have next-to-no content on them, or gibberish content.  There are sites that might be a logical fit for you in terms of theme, but Google’s contextual network would never have really picked up on them because of their (lack of) relevant seeming content.  This doesn’t mean the sites are a bad fit, though.  Likewise, you probably never would have picked up on these sites as managed placements alone, either, because often times that would be too broad a targeting method.
  • If you aren’t the brainstormiest of search marketers, the DCO goes out and finds places where your ads would not have otherwise been running.  This is not just referring to the aforementioned point.  This is to say it will find other contextual themes that you might not have thought of.  The double edge of this sword, however, is that if you have already done a fantastic and thorough job, the DCO might have a hard time finding more nuggets that make sense, and cannibalize your existing nuggets
  • On the whole, you may be able to get a lot of incremental volume from the DCO.  However, this was not exactly my experience.  Ultimately the DCO took over from more ROI positive contextual network campaigns.  Though conversion volume improved greatly, margins shrunk so much that the net effect was more or less a wash.  Google – 1, Advertiser – 0.

Cons of the DCO

  • My biggest complaint about the DCO is a lack of control.  You are basically at the mercy of the CPA you set, and CPC’s can vary greatly from day to day.  This can mean a less than desirable CPA for you.
  • Cannibalization is an enormous issue with the DCO.  Many of my existing contextual campaigns have been, for all intents and purposes, obliterated.  This is why the DCO is like crack.  One you start, you can’t stop, because you have nothing left to fall back on.  The only control you are left with is negative placement optimization, but no ability to adjust bids at a placement level.  In an attempt to promote the best performing campaigns, I have added negatives to the DCO or my original contextual campaigns on a case-by-case basis, letting each placement reside in the campaign where it has performed best.
  • DCO is still in beta.  This means there can be technical issues sometimes, and because Google has a stronghold (dare I say a monopoly) on this contextually-relevant sort of market, advertisers are basically at Google’s mercy to make it right when these occur
  • DCO is probably not going to work well for you if you have a weak Display URL structure, unless all of your ads are extremely relevant to one sort of theme.

The Numbers

While I cannot publish exact numbers or where they are from, I can say that my overall contextual network conversion volume by month has decreased since implementing the DCO.  Furthermore, my acquisition cost has increased on a monthly basis.  While my numbers contain other hiccups and nuances to be sure, I have no concrete data thus far which indicates that the implementation of the DCO was a winning decision.  Any gains in certain pockets or places have been offset by increase in acquisition cost and decrease in control (and thus efficacy)

My Conclusion

I still have mixed emotions about the DCO.  It seems plausible to me that my campaigns could one day exceed the gross-profit performance of my “old” campaigns, but that has not happened yet.  Furthermore, as a performance marketer, I detest the hands-off approach that has to be taken with regards to the DCO.  If you do decide to try the DCO, I would recommend not to be too stingy with your starting CPA bids.  Furthermore, when you do make changes to those bids, make them meaningful ones.  If you do not give the automated tool enough wiggle room to play with, things may never get off the ground.  Watch your placements closely, and add negatives on a daily basis as needed (as soon as data is available for viewing) if you are spending in the thousands a day.

Posted in Search Engine Marketing | Leave a comment

The 10 Cardinal Sins of Paid Search Marketing

I forgot to post this here: My guest post at PPC Hero about the 10 things you shouldn’t neglect when performing Search Engine Marketing!  Here it is: http://www.ppchero.com/the-10-cardinal-sins-of-paid-search-marketing/

Posted in Search Engine Marketing | Leave a comment

Google AdWords Content Network Relative CTR

Google recently gave search marketers another nugget to let them know how well they are doing — Relative CTR.  While it’s no help for your search campaigns, think of it as a quality score of sorts for your contextual targeting.  Relative CTR tells you how your click through rate stacks up against your competitors on the websites where you ads are showing.  It does this with an order of magnitude of 1, with 1 meaning your click through rates are just as good as your competitors.  If your relative CTR is .3X (as the terminology goes), yours are only doing 30% as well as your competitors.

Now you ask, so what?  I’m already doing everything I can with my creatives to maximize my click through rate.  Well, maybe you are, and maybe you aren’t.  If you are targeting multiple ad groups that are only a few degrees of separation away from other one another in terms of theme, Relative CTR might prod you to take top performing ad creatives from one ad group and put them in another, or vice versa.  Relative CTR is also a helpful metric to let you know how your brand-new ad group is doing.  If you’ve recently started an ad group, and your relative CTR is .3X, you know things are going to be an uphill battle.

In sum, make sure you have relative CTR check on your list of columns.  It is sure to be a somewhat helpful metric when you are optimizing your content campaigns.

Relative CTR

 

Posted in Search Engine Marketing | Leave a comment

Microsoft adCenter Adds Conversions to Search Query Reporting

The title says it all on this one; Microsoft has finally added conversions to its search query reporting.  This was one of the very glaring features absent from Microsoft adCenter (ahem still no CPA column for Campaigns).  The feature appears to have been added August 2nd mid day, so use August 3rd, 2011 going forward for search query reports from Microsoft.  Unlike intelligent Google technology, which adjusts its CPA columns in search query reports for historical data that did not have conversion tracking installed, Microsoft just rolled this out very quietly and with no fanfare.  So, if you run an all time search query report hoping to see the conversion data, it isn’t going to be there!  So, don’t try that.

If you are a beginning search marketer and are wondering why this is significant, it is very convenient to be able to see which of your actual search queries (the actual phrases people searched on) are or are not leading to your conversions.  Thus, you can optimize your negative keyword lists, and add new keywords for increased efficiency.  If you wanted to track your adCenter search queries and conversions before, you needed a 3rd party tracking system, or at the very least, some Google Analytics hacking.  I personally find the latter to be a cumbersome approach when search marketing, so I am very pleased Microsoft has rolled this new feature out.

Microsoft adCenter Search Query Report

Posted in Search Engine Marketing | Leave a comment

Google Introduces Impression Share Metrics for Content Network

This week, Google finally started letting advertisers see Impression Share metric for their Content Network campaigns.  If you are wondering what Impression Share is, this is the number that tells you what percentage of the time you showed up for eligible impressions — in other words, how many times your ad showed up vs. the number of times it could have showed up.  Now, what does one do with these metrics?  Depending on the number of ad groups you have in your Content Network Campaign, Content Network Impression Share may or may not be useful to you.  Like Search Impression Share, if you are maxing our your opportunity at a given lead cost, Impression Share metrics may be a moot point for you.  However, they can be a good indicator of missed opportunity, especially Exact Match Impression Share for Search.

Presently, I have a number of Content Network campaigns, and many of them show a much lower Impression Share than I would imagine for them — either “under 10%” or just above that amount.  However, others show in the 20% to 60% range, which seems more acceptable.  The numbers do not make total sense to me given campaigns that show high positions and seemingly have excellent coverage are saying they have low Impression Share.  This may have to do with ad groups that show up in poor positions muddying the entire campaign.  Ultimately, Content Network Impression Share is just one more metric to let you know how you are doing with maximizing your opportunity.  So, if you really want to try to maximize this metric, perhaps consider splitting up ad groups into different campaigns — hopefully your ad group reorganization doesn’t do more harm than good!

 

Posted in Search Engine Marketing | Leave a comment

Dayparting Your AdWords Campaigns

At long last, Google has finally given users access to hourly conversion data through the AdWords interface.  This is extremely valuable information, particularly to search marketers performing lead generation, as they typically have little to no conversion latency to deal with.  With this information, you can choose to bid more in high converting hours of the day, and bid less in lower converting hours of the day.  But first, let’s identify some key concepts and themes to grasp before you start monkeying with your strategy!

Conversion Latency
If you are going to daypart, it is important to understand “Conversion latency.”  This is the concept of how long it takes a user to go from their first click to conversion.  If you are selling fancy toilets for $2,500, chances are you are going to have a lot of conversion latency while the person makes up their mind.  It might take one day, a week, or more for the person to convert, and they might click your ads multiple times.  However, if you are dealing with lead gen, there is typically little conversion latency, and as much as 70 to 80 percent of your conversions could be happening right there on the spot.  So, before you daypart, identify how much conversion latency you have.

In order to identify your conversion latency, go to “Conversions” under AdWords’ “Reporting and Tools” menu and then click “Search Funnels.”  By the way, if you do not have Google’s Conversion Tracking set up, I suggest you do so post-haste.  Once you are in the Search Funnels menu, you can look at path length and time lag. See menus at left here:Conversion Latency

If you are getting a large number of conversions occurring with just one click, I think it is safe to say you are okay to daypart.  However, if you are getting two, three, or four clicks to a conversion, and it is showing latency of two to three days, you might want to think twice before you daypart up or down.  This is because your “Assisting” clicks may be happening during hours of the day that don’t show any recorded conversions, however, these clicks are critical to your closing the sale.  Thus, you do not want to bid lower during these time periods simple because you could potentially be cannibalizing all of your efforts.

Identifying Your Dayparts
Once you have identified that you want to daypart, then what do you do?  Return to your Campaigns tab in Adwords, and select the campaign you want to daypart.  If you want to daypart everything together, do not select a campaign — depending on your account structure, this may or may not be advisable.  Next, click the Dimensions tab.  If this is not selected, you will have to select it from the little arrow dropdown next to Campaigns, Ad Groups, Keywords, etc.  Here it is:


AdWords Conversion By Hour

Once you are on the Dimensions tab, select Hour of Day, and then choose your date range.  I suggest at least three months of data to get a good sampling, but if you are working with a large spending account, less time might be acceptable.  Once you have your report, toss it into Excel, and identify groups of hours that are working well and not working well.  Here is the key: You can only identify six dayparts.  Thus, try to find six groups of hours that go together (sequentially) so that you can decide to bid them up, down, or leave them alone.  Also, you may want to consider bidding differently for different days of the week (particularly the weekend).  This might require some work to get the data you want in a useable form.

Setting Up Your Dayparts
Now that you have identified your six (or fewer) dayparts, you need to implement them on your campaign(s).  You will have to go to the settings tab for this, and then click on the ad schedule for your desired campaign.  Then you will have to change the Mode from Basic to Bid Adjustment.  Now you will have the option to set your Ad Scheduling.  Start with Monday, add your time periods (up to six), and select what you want your bid to be.  To leave it alone, set it at 100%, and to bid up put 110%, or down 90% — or more or less depending on how much you want the bid to change.  The main thing to keep in mind when setting up dayparting is to keep your changes minimal for a start.  For example, if you set your bid to 25% of its original bid, it’s likely the keyword will not show at all for that given time period, in which case you might as well shut it off (which is also an option within dayparting).  Keep to small changes at first, but not so small they won’t make a difference. In this example, the ads are shut off two hours of the day, but are running at various percentages of bid for the rest of the day.

Google AdWords Ad Scheduling

Final Notes
A couple of final tidbits to go over.  One should know that dayparting doesn’t work with Google’s Conversion Optimizer.  So if you’re using this feature, you are out of luck.  Secondly, if you want to daypart in Microsoft adCenter, you have to select one of their six mediocre dayparts.  Sometimes these may align with your data, other times they may not.  Furthermore, adCenter does not make conversion data by hour available through their User Interface.  Thus, you will have to join your backend conversion data to your hourly spend from adCenter, and this does not properly mitigate for conversion latency.  Or, you can try to get fancy with your Google Analytics, but this will not have the spend data from adCenter incorporated.  In any event, this tutorial is best applied to Google because adCenter’s dayparting options are, as mentioned, weak at best.

In my own campaigns, I’ve seen dayparting boost ROI by 10 to 20% or more depending on the vertical.  So, if you aren’t using Conversion Optimizer, I highly suggest seeing what sort of efficiencies can be gained through dayparting!

Posted in Search Engine Marketing | Leave a comment

Google AdWords Campaign Structure

Google gives you the option to have up to 100 campaigns in either a standard or an expanded AdWords account.  These are the limits for a standard/expanded Google Adwords account:

  • Standard: 100 campaigns / Expanded: 100
  • Standard: 2000 ad groups per campaign / Expanded: 10,000
  • Standard: 2000 keywords per ad group / Expanded: 5,000
  • Standard: 300 display ads per ad group (including image ads) / Expanded: 300
  • Standard: 50 text ads per ad group / Expanded: 50
  • Standard: About 50,000 keywords per account / Expanded: 1 million

That said, what do you do with a campaign?  There are many different ways to skin this cat, but unless you really need help with organization, campaigns exist only for one reason: to change settings at the campaign level that cannot be changed at a lower level.  The question that begs is, what are those settings?  Here are the important ones:

  • Search targeting vs. Content targeting (as well as Google’s search network)
  • Day parting: bidding more or less on certain days of week and/or hours of day (now easier than ever using Google AdWords’ hourly conversion data)
  • Device type: computer vs. mobile
  • Standard or Accelerated ad deliver: how fast you want your budget to deplete throughout the day
  • Geo-targeting: by city, state, country, radius of a point, or custom geographic shape
  • Bid type: manual bids, or Google’s conversion optimizer (that will adjust your bids based off conversion data)
  • Budget: unless you are a brand advertiser or have other constraints, I presume you want to spend as much as possible if you are converting clicks to leads or sales at a certain rate

Thus, if you have a group of keywords that needs to have anything changed together for one of these settings, that means they belong together in a campaign.  Do you have a business unit that needs to have higher bids during the day because you have a call center that is open?  You will need to day part those keywords, and that means it goes in a campaign.  Do you want to target mobile devices separately from computers (which you damn well should be doing)?  You will need separate campaigns for that as well.  Want to target different states for different business units or goals (i.e. if you are targeting Chrysler car dealers in certain states or cities and Nissan in others)?  Those will need different campaigns as well.

As you can see from the plethora of options available in the campaign settings, these are valuable marketing tools!  You only get 100 campaigns, so use them wisely.  If you want to group certain themes of keywords together, that is what ad groups are for.  Don’t waste your campaigns on grouping for reasons extraneous to the need to change settings.  Otherwise, you might be out of campaigns before you know it!

Posted in Search Engine Marketing | Leave a comment

Everything You Need To Know About Google AdWords Sitelinks

Google AdWords sitelinks have been around for about a year now, and if you hadn’t heard, these can help your click through rate… a LOT.  The funny thing about sitelinks is (usually) people don’t actually click the sitelinks: they just click on your ad.  Nonetheless, the added real estate from AdWords sitelinks means your CTR can go up by 10, 20, 30% or more from what it used to be.  There is still a lot of confusion stemming from sitelinks, and that’s because they’re still a half baked idea.  Hopefully Google will get around to finishing it sometime, but in the meanwhile, here’s what you need to know about sitelinks.

  1. Sitelinks don’t show up automatically.  Your ad needs to have a certain amount of quality, and needs to be appearing in one of the top positions.  Google will automatically decide how many sitelinks you get to show based off of your ad rank.
  2. Destination URL reporting for sitelinks is not available… period.  An enormous oversight in a World of destination URL reporting tags and Marin bid management tools
  3. Viewing the data on sitelinks clicks is tricky.  You have to segment at the campaign level by click type on the campaign tab to see who actually clicked on the sitelink.  In contrast, on the extensions tab, that shows the number of clicks that occurred to any ad that showed a sitelink.Seeing how may people actually clicked on the sitelink itself:
    Google Adwords Sitelinks Clicks Button

     

    This is what you’ll see:

    Google Adwords Sitelinks Clicks Results
    Seeing how many people clicked on ads that had a sitelink showing:
    Ensure you have the dimensions tab selected, which you should if you were able to set up sitelinks.  Then you will be able to see click data for any ad that had a sitelink showing with it.  Note this is not click data for the sitelinks themselves, but for the entire ad unit.
    Adwords Sitelinks Extensions Clicks

  4. If you aren’t using sitelinks, you could very well be leaving money on the table, especially on terms where you are killing it.  If you are ranking in positions 5, 6, and 7, sitelinks aren’t going to get you much of anything.  But if you own a set of keywords, it behooves you to get sitelinks going A.S.A.P.
Posted in Search Engine Marketing | Leave a comment

Think Before You “Best Practice”

Internet marketing has earned a reputation similar to that of snake oil sales, and rightfully so.  There are so many hacks in the industry that it’s hard to know who to trust.  Best practices are just that — best practice.  That doesn’t mean that they are hard and fast rules, however.  Here’s five best practices that might make you want to think twice.

1. Put your keywords in your ads. A favorite tactic of mine is when you receive an email from a salesperson with a screenshot of Google Ad results showcasing YOUR “untargeted ads.”  They will tell you, “You need to have your keywords in the title. Your ads are untargeted and we can help!”  This often makes an in house search marketer or consultant look like they don’t know what they are doing if that email finds its way into the hands of the client.

All it takes is a Google Search to reveal that people think you should put keywords into your ads.  The fact is, keywords in titles do frequently help boost your click through rate.  However, time and again, I have seen many verticals or keyword sets where it is actually more beneficial to have something other than keywords stuffed in the titles or descriptions.  Sometimes it is possible for a value proposition to get superior click through than just keywords or a combination of words and keywords.

Here’s a first-hand example of mine from the debt consolidation vertical, where clicks regularly cost upwards of twenty dollars.  Most all ads contain “debt consolidation” in the title, description, or both.  In such an expensive space, if you can’t break into the top three and do something with an expanded title (meaning your 25 character title plus a 35 character description 1), you have to do something to break the mold.  Unfortunately, “outside the box” thinking often times has no place in paid search marketing (sorry SES panel jockeys), so I’m not talking about anything incredibly crazy.  However, the title “Consolidate Debts Fast” actually outperformed titles containing “Debt Consolidation” (and this was in the days before Google bolded keyword synonyms in titles).  So, test and make decisions for yourself.  You might be surprised.

2. Always be testing. This is a short one.  Yes, it is great to test.  No, you do not have to do it for the rest of time.  Now, if you are not testing creatives and landing pages, I am certain you are leaving money on the table.  However, sometimes there comes a creative or landing page so great that it cannot be beat (like the Leeds Mattress guy).  If you have a stellar control creative that continues to defeat new variations over and over again, perhaps it’s time to let the winner win.

3. Eliminate “bad” keywords off the bat. I’ve had many a consultant praise the use of negative keywords.  To assume that a keyword is bad without testing it, however, can mean you are missing opportunity.  For many verticals, search queries containing “naked” or “free” might seem like these keywords would definitely not result in conversions.  People are fickle, however, and I’ve seen many a search query containing “naked” and “free” result in dollars and cents on websites that are neither free, nor do they have nakedness.  Ultimately, you want to test as many relevant search queries as possible, and have them integrated as keywords for ultimate control.

4. Quality Score optimization. Some keywords have bad quality scores just because it’s in their DNA.  For example, if you want to bid on the exact match variation of a high volume term, such as that of an automotive manufacturer, it is going to have a low quality score.  Why?  Because you aren’t that automotive manufacturer, and there is a lot of search volume on that keyword!  If you can afford to show up with a quality score of 3, however, it behooves you to keep on showing up.  You aren’t going to be able to get the quality score higher by keyword spamming your ad text and landing pages, you just have to deal with it.  Too much focus is put on Quality Score in the blogosphere (even if it is incredibly important).  If you are doing the “right things” with regards to theming your ad groups, separating out high volume keywords, adding negative keywords, and so forth, quality scores will fall where they may and that is that.  Quality Score can be an indicator of where you need to focus, but other metrics such as Click Through Rate and Conversion Rate are even more effective to look at.

5. You need statistical significance.  With search engine marketing, there will always be someone to look at what you are doing, and say you must do X or Y differently.  The fact of the matter is that every vertical and its respective keywords and searcher intents are different.  There are no blanket rules that apply to every single thing.  When you are search marketing, think for yourself.  Create hypotheses and test them if you have to.  Make logical deductions from data, and cut corners to get there faster if you have to.  Sometimes trusting your gut based off observations can outweigh statistical significance.

Posted in Search Engine Marketing | Tagged | Leave a comment

Google Snuck Us A Fast Nugget: Display URL & Quality Score

Sometimes it might be possible to observe a relationship between a certain ad and keyword quality score.  For example, if you have three ads and one is seasoned with a high click through rate, you might see your quality score drop immediately if you pause that old ad, and CPC’s will go up consequentially.  Google recently revealed in their help section one of the reasons behind this, going beyond simple “Ad rank” of a new ad.  Display URL actually plays a part in Quality Score for a given ad group!  Apparently it has always been this way, but now we know it is a factor (even though Google hasn’t made a big parade out of this new information).  It is also now possible to have multiple display URLs in one ad group, which was previously not allowed.

Google says here, “The historical CTR of the display URLs in the ad group” is one of the factors.  To those people out there that are new at this, Google did not always come out and say this.  While it has been known that other factors, such as account history, are important, Display URL and quality score is not something that Google has talked about before.  So, if you didn’t know, now you do!

Posted in Search Engine Marketing | Tagged | Leave a comment